Back to his old tricks
Disclaimer: Geez, guys…if I realized I was going to inadvertently earn the ire of a nation of Stay at Home Babe fans, I might have thought a moment before I wrote that I thought she might not be a real person. Then again, I probably wouldn’t have changed my opinion if she hadn’t emailed me and convinced me otherwise. So, I get it. She’s real. Probably most of the other “bunnies” are real, too. As suggested in the comments of this post, however, the heckling and comments directed at her and the other female bloggers on Upstart Blogger may have been staged to rack up drama (and therefore hits). The subject of this post is not Stay at Home Babe’s identity but that of the person currently blogging as “Upstart Blogger”.
You ever get really strong deja vu?
September is, apparently, going to be a big month in the Upstart Blogger empire…AshleyMorgan.com, EnormousReloaded.com (now relocated at Enormous.co) and his new record label…thing (not to be confused with his old record label), 447 Records, are all slated to launch this month.
So, it’s not surprising that — keeping with the tradition of doing everything at once across all his blogs — he chose right now to try his latest traffic-bait post on a little Twitter “trick” that he’s been practicing for the last 6 months or so.
But wait, you say, isn’t Upstart Blogger under new management? Let’s take a look at that, and, in the process, revisit some ancient history.
First of all, let’s rewind the clock a couple years to probably shortly after Upstart Blogger was purchased from its original owner. Around that time, another blog surfaced that was supposedly written by a teenager living in his parents’ basement in the UK trying to make it rich by trying every scheme he could BitTorrent the ebook for. His name was Avon Blake. He, of course, was a work of fiction.
Avon Blake’s initial claim to fame (such as it was) was by bashing big names in blogging. He posted a link to a .torrent file of Tim Ferriss’ Four Hour Work Week and earned the ire of Ferriss and his peeps. He slagged on Chris Pearson (okay, not a difficult thing to do), founder of DIYThemes and Thesis. Apparently, this wasn’t generating enough traffic, so he turned to porn. He wrote about scoring a hot new girlfriend at a party who wouldn’t have paid any attention to him at all if he hadn’t said that he was a superstar blogger and suddenly she wants to sleep with him and pose naked for him for his blog and his future porn empire. No, seriously. Eventually, this leads him to Lindsey Dawn-McKenzie, an actual UK porn star, though for the purposes of this blog, she’s actually a fictional representation of a real person. Then he gets a letter from a girl named Hannah who wants him to help her make tons of money, too, with her blog, and join in the porn-fun.
Hannah, though her character would change a bit, eventually evolved into Hannah Solo, who later became the Evangelist-in-Chief of AM’s ebook, Twitter/Genesis Rocket. But that’s not how HannahSolo.com started. Hannah started off being a male version of Avon Blake, only lighter on the blogging tips and heavier on the porn posts (though she never actually posted porn on her site, it was obvious it was ramping up to it). And here’s another catch — Hannah Solo, obviously an assumed internet pseudonym, was actually Lindsey Dawn McKenzie. *aaaaahhhh*error*error*continuity breach* Yes, one of Hannah’s earliest posts was about how her name was actually Lindsey Dawn McKenzie (but not that Lindsey Dawn McKenzie) and so she had to change her name to avoid being confused with the porn star. Obviously. But despite that, she wasn’t above linking to, blogging about, and later stealing the domain from the actual Lindsey Dawn McKenzie. And while there was no later connection to Avon Blake despite the “letter from a poor girl named Hannah” which later disappeared from the internet after the site was pulled down, they did chat back and forth on Twitter and on each other’s blogs and both happily linked back to Upstart Blogger (and each other) whenever possible.
Upstart Blogger’s author treated the two blogs with a sort of paternal “oh those crazy kids” attitude (which is not exactly how I would respond if my kids were trying to build a porn empire), linking to them when it benefited UB, but not when they posted the pr0n. Eventually, AvonBlake.com was pulled by its host, and all the porn-related posts on HannahSolo.com were removed to make room for Twitter Rocket, because you can’t have your leading advertiser talk about how she wants to get rich posing nude when you’re trying to sell the case that she is rich from selling Twitter Rocket.
What ties these characters together is our friend at Upstart Blogger. Both Hannah and Avon are fictional characters created by AM to push more traffic to Upstart Blogger. So now, let’s revisit the question of Upstart Blogger’s current ownership.
At the end of 2009, AM said he no longer wanted to be involved in Upstart Blogger, and put it to the readers to fill the site in with content. I wrote one introductory post which I later pulled down after I saw Upstart Blogger being used to promote and sell yet another scammy product (more than one, actually), and I started writing The Rise and Fall of Upstart Blogger. Allowing a blogging free-for-all didn’t work out so great. There was a small handful of real people who blogged on this “new” Upstart Blogger (myself included) and several other new fictional authors. Early in March 2009, he started writing about just selling Upstart Blogger (note: most of those posts have been pulled down now). But he didn’t actually want to sell it sell it, he wanted to retain executive control while remaining hands-off. Sort of reap the benefits and let someone else deal with the hard work of running the site. On April 26, one of the few real UB posters, David Corti, posted that he was the new owner of Upstart Blogger, and would be working on revamping the site and changing the design.
Among the things he did in his brief ownership was create a new Twitter account for UpstartBlogger, @upstart_blogger and create a new theme for the site. @upstart_blogger has been removed (although there was a period of time when it existed at the same time as the new Upstart Blogger Twitter account @weareupstart and you could see the date that @upstart_blogger stopped tweeting was the same day that @weareupstart started), and the theme has been changed back to something that is characteristic of AM’s library of other blog themes, in particular signaly 37 and Genesis.
Then one day, David Corti stopped posting, and “Upstart Blogger” started posting. This wasn’t just a username switch, you can still see the posts by David Corti, and it’s not a renaming of AM’s account, either, since his posts are all accessible as well. Nor is either of those humans saying “oh yeah, I’m posting as Upstart Blogger now” but, still, the Upstart Blogger user is posting as if it is the new owner of Upstart Blogger, and as if it has been given a bunch of stuff from the old owner of Upstart Blogger (whose name we don’t mention anymore).
And among “the box” of stuff given to the “new” owner from the “old” owner was several hundreds of Twitter accounts, which brings us to the post from a few days ago where he said he would give away a Twitter account with over 10,000 followers and reveal how he was able to create an account with that many followers in 24 hours. If you followed AM’s Twitter account over the last year, you would have seen him bouncing from one username to the next, before finally settling on a completely new profile that — suddenly — had the same number of followers as his old Twitter account while not actually being that Twitter account. Which is, apparently, a trick of building one Twitter account, doing the aggressive following tricks he is known for from Twitter/Genesis Rocket (and then dumping all the users the account is following), and then doing a bait-and-switch technique of renaming the old account and creating a new account with the same name. Before Twitter’s servers are able to process that those are two separate accounts, they, instead, assume they’re actually the same account and magically you get however many followers the other account had. Clever. Update: It’s actually not nearly as convoluted and tricksy as I thought. Really, the only trick with 10000in24 was creating a new account as 10000in24, then changing the name and taking an old account and changing that to 10000in24, making it appear as if @10000in24 earned 10,000 followers overnight (when, in actuality, it did no such thing — that user is now named something irrelevant and those followers came from someplace else, which is exactly what AM’s been doing with his Twitter accounts).
Now. Given this particularly sneaky trick, and his past sneaky tricks, fake authors, and bait-and-switches, is there any question who the identity of the mysterious “Upstart Blogger” user is? No, I didn’t think so either.
And don’t bother trying to grab the 10000in24 Twitter account, he’s already rigged it — like all his other “giveaways” — so that no one can win. Take a look at this screenshot and see if you can figure out why:
As Admiral Ackbar said, IT’SATRAP!
So, what’s the hook attached to the juicy new bait that’s been pushed in the new “I’m giving everything away for free” attitude of Upstart Blogger? If what he’s told me personally is to be believed, all he’s really after is traffic, something the site has been losing steadily since December. Posting new Twitter hacks is certainly in line with that, as are the new (fake possibly fake) authors trying to pull in a different type of audience. Or maybe we’ll see something new and fabulous (also fake) like the Genesis Arc program that was supposed to be a fantastic network of Twitter accounts pushing traffic back and forth which never actually existed. I’m cynical enough to believe that there’s ulterior motives to his magnanimous sharing of everything for free.
Update: Okay, so there are a few humans in the world. One of them, I’m fairly sure, is here.
I can assure you that I am a real person, as I have stopped posting on Upstart. The other two chick writers have also realized that the Upstart audience won’t benefit them much and have doubts about continuing to post, but they are also genuinely nice ladies. We didn’t realize that the Upstart audience was so tailored to something completely outside of what we would be writing about. Naive? Maybe. Regardless, we’re all just moving on with our individual blogs. It’s not a matter of looking to see how old our blogs are, but looking to see how long they last that is an indicator of our genuine person-hood. If you want to email me, I’d be glad to tell you my personal information so you can be assured that I am not a fabrication… just a poor misguided “newbie” I suppose.
Stay at Home Babe
September 2, 2010 at 10:12 am
Ah. Forgive me if I am a bit cynical but our anti-hero has a habit of posting comments as other fictional characters as seen here, here, and on my own blog here. You have a blog where you don’t ever post your own name, nor is your profile pic either there or on Facebook of a real human being, and your email address uses a free service (with no name attached, just your pseudonym) that anyone could make, and — forgive me for saying — you write like a guy trying to write like what he thinks a girl would write (this isn’t just my opinion either, I’ve talked to two women who both say the same thing). Oh, and you somehow found this blog without ever having mentioned you or linked to your blog directly and without me tweeting about it publicly (on the other hand, I happen to know for a fact that AM has ongoing alerts that shoot him an email whenever a Google search pulls up his name, but, of course, you already knew that). If you are real, and you have been legitimately burned, I have a little box on my sidebar with my contact info for those occasions. If, on the other hand, you are, like your predecessors, a work of fiction, may you fall into oblivion like those that came before you when, in 6 months from now, he gets too bored or tired of trying to maintain the facade or tries to use you to build up some other imminently-doomed scam.
jazzs3quence
September 2, 2010 at 10:47 am
I’ve crossed international borders with last trouble convincing someone I’m a real person. Shit. Okay, I give up. I guess just keep checking back on my blog and when the posts there continue infinitely and my posts on Upstart have stopped abruptly then I will be a real person. I’m not offended that you think I write like a guy trying to write like a girl… I’m just kind of stumped. I don’t know how to take that.
Stay at Home Babe
September 2, 2010 at 11:05 am
Hey, I’m willing to entertain the idea. You earn points for having a different IP address (although last I heard he was using some IP address-obscuring tool to obfuscate his trolling). And, see? I changed the post to say “possibly fake” instead of just fake. But, if I might ask, why does it matter? Is it just to correct that minor point in a blog post that’s mostly about something entirely different? It’s not as if the main point of pulling in a different type of audience to try to regain his traffic stats isn’t accurate regardless of whether you’re real or not.
jazzs3quence
September 2, 2010 at 11:14 am
*less* trouble, not last… damn I hate typos
Stay at Home Babe
September 2, 2010 at 11:06 am
Arrrgh, I had a conspiracy theory of my own that I thought was right.
So, are you TheDude / Awful commenter from UB?
If you are then this changes my whole theory. If not here’s what I think is happening:
First, I believe the bloggers on UB are real people…Upstart Bunnies as they called themselves.
And to be honest I couldn’t believe that they were on UB. I was one of the ones that hated the Upstart Bunnies era. I didn’t understand why you would hand over a blog with a high pagerank, well positioned for blogging and wordpress themes, and hand it over to a bunch of mommy bloggers that posted about their daily routine, nonsense, and cheating. Yes, holy crap, a post about cheating?! But, now it’s starting to make sense…I think.
A commentor, thedude, shows up. He writes well, similar to another blogger – Ashley. I immediately begin to believe that this anonymous commentor is Ashley. He’s hypercritical of the bunnies. He’s so critical that the bunnies actually delete posts due to his criticism. His arguments are harsh but well thought. He’s angry about the direction of UB. He even volunteers to write for UB, to show how it should be done. All the while, other commentors (more fakes I believe) are demanding that he stop being anonymous and reveal himself. At this point I’m now addicted to UB, I’m refreshing the pages a lot. I love the drama and suspense of the revelation of ‘thedude’. And then it stops.
The bunnies post unhindered. Until recently, near September, near some important launches. StayAtHomeBabe posts about problogger, calling him a scam artist. Her argument isn’t that strong, and a new commentor (new identity?) ‘Awful’ shows up and slams StayAtHomeBabe. He seems angry that she’s insinuating that money = scam. Perhaps, someone is angry about such a generalization towards making money online because they have their own product ready to launch?
Again, I’m addicted. Unfortunately, something happens behind the scenes (SAHB realizing the ruse?) and SAHB deletes her posts and leaves UB. It seems, catching UB by surprise.
And now we wait…
Behind the scenes I think Ashley has had his hand on UB the whole time, leaving it to David Corti to run UB as an editor. I don’t think David owns it, only serving as the figurehead ‘UpstartBlogger’. Obviously, the traffic of UB has plummeted, they needed to do something. They hatch a plan:
Bring in polarizing newbie bloggers, struggling to find their voice, and let them post. More than likely, the core UB audience will despise them. Ashley, as the voice of the people, posing as thedude, criticizes them. Since they’re new and inexperienced it’s easy to tear them apart. Nothing like a good fight to pull in an audience. It works. I continue to visit UB hoping that ‘thedude’ will show up in the comments. Even ‘UpstartBlogger’ states that traffic is up.
I start putting things together when ‘thedude’ mysteriously disappears. (Maybe rushing to put finishing pieces of a project together?) He returns (I believe it’s the same person) as ‘Awful’, just in time for some launches. So, assuming that you’re not ‘thedude’ or ‘Awful – here’s what I think we should look out for:
As the Upstart Bunnies exit, don’t be surprised that ‘thedude’ shows up as UB’s new blogger. He’ll be on a white horse trumpeting a heroic change to UB. Gone are the poorly written posts about cheating, now back to blogging. Around this time, as Ashley launches his new projects, Ashley returns to UB to show his approval (to himself). Together, they launch a $ product, for the good of humanity.
Another reason I believe that AM is orchestrating UB, even going as far as the comments. I didn’t like the Upstart bunnies. I went so far as commenting on UB that I didn’t like it. Yet, my comments never made it through moderation. It was like someone was saying ‘hey, don’t steal my thunder’.
If I’m right, what Ashley has done is cruel. Again I have every belief that the bunnies are real people. It’s almost brilliant that instead of Ashley creating another fake character, to have real bloggers do the work for you.
As cruel as it is, it’s damn interesting. I’m highly anticipating what happens next.
That is, unless, you are ‘thedude’. Then I guess it’s all just poor business planning on UB’s part and internet trolling on yours.
Far less interesting.
Observer
September 3, 2010 at 11:02 am
What’s to say that you aren’t AM, hmmmm? But no, your IP doesn’t match his so I think I can safely say you aren’t…
Nope, not thedude. I almost can’t comment on UB because if I did, he’d know it was me. I’ve got a whole lot more on him than I’m saying at the moment and he knows most of it because a lot of it he actually told me (and if they were lies, well, they were self-incriminating lies that would still be damaging to his family and marriage). I’ve been tempted a few times, but no, haven’t commented on UB in a long time and I would never comment as someone else, anyway. If I commented, it would be either as ‘chris’ or as ‘jazzs3quence’ and if Gravatars were turned on, would display mine. I don’t hide behind fake identities like some other people *cough*. >.>
And I’ve exchanged emails with Stay at Home Babe as a result of this post. Pretty sure she’s a real person. I won’t go into detail about what caused her to leave UB. But I will say that Ashley has a history of rigging the comments. He did it on my personal blog. He did it on the SWBN and Allison Reynolds’ blog. He did it on another blog (all of which I link to in my reply to SAHB up there ^^^ ). So, while I wasn’t paying nearly enough attention to the comments, personally, based on what I’ve been hearing, I think you’re dead on. Which would go with what’s already been established as his modus operandi.
And more than that…at the beginning of 2010 he introduced this whole new idea of a multi-blogger blog, and he was going to pull in all these different bloggers but they were really just the readers of UB. Well, THAT was rigged as well. A couple of them (including myself for about a week) were real, and the rest were fake authors he created who posted about crap. Eventually he says he’s going to give the blog away, and the readers run to the rescue. “No, you can’t do that, we love you” yadda yadda yadda. Ultimately the readers (assuming any of them are real at this point) say “what if you just oversaw UB and didn’t actually write for it, but you managed who the writers were, rather than it being a free-for-all.” Which is what he wanted in the first place, only under the guise of making it “your” blog. At this point he’s manipulated the audience into justifying him controlling all the content, which was a clever workaround to the agreement he made with the Immediate Edge folks as outlined in his apology. Which, since I haven’t looked at it recently, gives us yet another clue — the apology page has been edited to imply that the events took place before the blog was sold (which of course, it never was). So the “Upstart Blogger” author is him justifying posting on his own blog after he’s decided (and stated elsewhere) that he wasn’t going to.
jazzs3quence
September 3, 2010 at 11:48 am
The Stay at Home Babe is real. She’s even posted on her personal blog about a late-night conversation she had with one of my friends, which I knew about as it was happening. So, while the blog you don’t like might have it’s problems, please cut the Stay at Home Babe some slack. Thanks!
She's real...
September 3, 2010 at 2:24 pm
Yes, well, the point of this post was not the real-ness or fake-ness of Stay at Home Babe, but, rather, whether the person posting on Upstart Blogger as “Upstart Blogger” was anyone other than the same person who’s been the registered domain owner and author of the site since 2006. As I’ve stated in other comments and in the post (see, I even link to her), I have had email conversations with her which have swayed me to believe that she’s not actually a fictional character and have amended my post to reflect that. Yes, I realize she just blogged about how I thought she was fiction. No, I don’t still hold that opinion. That doesn’t mean there aren’t other fictional characters (or at least aliases to hide the real author’s identity) writing on UpstartBlogger.com in posts and in comments.
jazzs3quence
September 3, 2010 at 2:52 pm
I understand the original point, and think it could have been made without throwing The Babe under The Bus. That’s all. Thanks for the reply.
She's real, Part III
September 4, 2010 at 11:32 am
Noted. I wasn’t trying to throw anyone under the bus. At least, I wasn’t trying to throw anyone under the bus whose name didn’t have the initials A. M. and rhyme with Smashley Corgan.
jazzs3quence
September 4, 2010 at 11:45 am
A late-night PHONE conversation, that is – the kind where you can tell, you know, if someone is a boy or a girl.
She's real, Part II...
September 3, 2010 at 2:25 pm
I wanted to stop over here to clear up a few points:
First and foremost, I wanted to thank Chris for being so willing to alter his post (so dramatically in fact) and concede that neither I nor my blog are fabrications, after I emailed him my verifiable personal information. I also wanted to thank him for posting a link to my blog in his right-hand margin as a result of this realization. It was very, very kind of him to bend over backward to admit he had jumped to the wrong conclusion. Most people wouldn’t have done it.
Second, (and I know this isn’t an awards so and maybe not the place for this but if you don’t get one more unsolicited sappy post from the Babe then it wouldn’t be a proper farwell, would it?) I really appreciate the support of my readers who came over here to testify on my behalf. It wasn’t my intention to redirect the focus of the important conversation that Chris is trying to have here about almost everything but me, but it does make me feel all warm and fuzzy regardless
. The point is, that I am lucky enough to have readers who will follow me anywhere, particularly into a dogfight. The drama at Upstart was a call to arms, and I’m sure a flood of traffic, how nice for Upstart.
Third, I ABSOLUTELY DO NOT think it’s bad to make money online. My Lovely Babies want merchandise, I am going to give them some. I will hopefully break even on the first run, not likely—will probably lose money, but it wouldn’t suck to make a few bucks off of tshirts eventually, and any other method that develops from my blog. I think it’s fantastic to make money online from some method that has value outside of charging someone to teach them how to go ahead and charge someone else. I think that ebooks which teach you how to charge other people for ebooks border on every other marketing structure we’ve ever seen which always seem to be remarkably pyramid shaped.
Fourth, I was thrown into the lion pit and told to write specifically off the topic of what Upstart Blogger had previously been. I was told the owner wanted a format change and that I was to ignore what had come before and any complaints that resulted. I was groomed to be the anti-Upstart as Upstart had been thus far. I was told that the old audience would grumble and go away and we would build a new one. If this was intentional crucifixion then the word cruel doesn’t even begin to explain it. Machiavellian maybe, unconscionable perhaps. Regardless, the characterization of my writing stings, but I can accept that I’m not everyone’s cup of tea. I am a music lover, a film and art appreciator of most types. However, there are still many genres that just don’t turn me on. Clearly, I was death metal dropped in the middle of the orchestra pit. Fine. But the hateful inhumanity that ensued was over the top, and yes my departure was sudden.
Fifth, I am not commenting on the speculations of what happened or what will happen because I don’t know. However, @Observer, you seem to have put much time and thought into it.
P.S. Smashley Corgan… funny.
Stay at Home Babe
September 4, 2010 at 1:29 pm
Yeah, sort of makes you want to join a roller derby team just to use it, doesn’t it?
jazzs3quence
September 4, 2010 at 6:33 pm
The historical pornography stuff isn’t quite as simple as you make out. I’m not entirely sure whether “Hannah” and “Hannah” were ever supposed to be the same person, but actually that’s an interesting theory – it’s not important. There was a character named “Abigail Titmuss”, who claimed to have stolen the http://www.totallytitmuss.com/ domain (now, as you’ll see, a blaringly NSFW blog sporting a familiar design), and had a Twitter account. The Hannah Solo character recommended Genesis Rocket (or wharever it was called at the time) to Abigail Titmuss on Twitter. Of course “Abi Titmuss” is the name of another real minor celebrity, and in April 2008 AM claimed to have been contacted by her people. (The comments revealing the identity of the mystery celebrity have been conveniently deleted, but the description remains – sure enough, “the sort of celebrity who used to be happy to court the tabloid press and celebrity game show circuit but now sees herself as a more serious author, albeit one who is happy to acknowledge and capitalize on her past notoriety”.)
The Mondo Dynamo character is notable. The Internet Archive Wayback Machine has since been blocked, but before that I was able to look and saw that years ago it was clearly the blog of some kind of pornography, er, “ringleader”. When I first saw the live site, it had become a brand new Morgan-designed Twitter Rocket promotional blog, attached to one of those coin-operated twitterfeed-fed Twitter accounts, but it seemed apparent that there really had been some kind of deal with a pornographer, probably the man who had been behind mondodynamo.com and the original Titmuss/McKenzie domain names. After all, it’s far more difficult to steal a domain name than the stories ever implied – there’s no such thing as a “domain name sniping service” like what Hannah Solo (and maybe “Abigail Titmuss”) claimed to use.
The stuff that’s happening now is certainly not as obvious as the stuff of the past, or maybe I’ve become less sensitive to the telltale minute. This post is interesting in that it uses a HTML blockquote in the middle of a sentence, something that I remember Avon Blake doing – I have never seen anyone else do it. If AM is the author known as “Upstart Blogger”, he has wised up and altered his writing style but that is not enough.
Joshua Goodwin
September 18, 2010 at 1:00 pm
Yeah, I remember the Hannah -> Abigail back and forth which was pretty quickly deleted, at least off Hannah’s tweets. I gloss over some bits like that because there isn’t anything left that can be pointed at in internet cache and when I’m making myself sound like a paranoid lunatic, I like to have at least some semblance of facts to back up my statements
That Abigail Titmuss story was actually what made my head spin about Hannah because she ran the same story. And later he– er, another person — did the same thing with totallyjodiemarsh.com; the “oh my god, I have the same name as a porn star” story. When I saw the new, “stolen” Abigail Titmuss site (which, for someone who’s not trying to be a porn star, her site looked an awful lot like a porn site), I went looking for the post about Hannah == Lindsey Dawn McKenzie (except, at the time, I couldn’t remember the porn star’s name who she said she shared) and found it missing.
I didn’t know the history of Mondo Dynamo — I only found it when it was that big yellow and black thing that was all blah blah Twitter Rocket saved my life blah and the Twitter account was, not only trash, but occasionally even more insidious trash in that it would take innocuous headlines and insert TR affiliate links after the headline rather than a link to the actual post. I think shortly after that it was suspended.
jazzs3quence
September 23, 2010 at 9:28 pm
[...] and had nothing to show for it. Attempts at getting other people to blog for him failed when suspicious activity started happening in the comments to increase the drama…and the hits. The downside of that is that all his bloggers are [...]
A slow day? « The Rise and Fall of Upstart Blogger
October 8, 2010 at 7:20 am
[...] I didn’t know much about which turned out to be very controversial, so much so that it was questioned if I was even a real person or just some traffic generating fabrication. Holy shit. And I was getting kicked in the teeth left and right over there by readers who didn’t [...]
I’m Totally Jennifer Aniston in the Divorce | StayAtHomeBabe.com
July 2, 2011 at 12:25 pm